Is emergency cesarean section more risky than elective cesarean section in women with previous cesarean section?
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Timing of Elective Cesarean Section
243 Received February 5, 2014; revised and accepted July 2, 2014. Published online July 3
متن کاملTrial of labor versus elective repeat cesarean section for the women with a previous cesarean section: a decision analysis
In order to reduce the cesarean-delivery rate, more and more pregnant women are offered trials of labor (TOL) after their previous cesarean sections. TOL and elective repeat cesarean section (ERCS) have different risks and benefits. We constructed a decision analysis to explore this issue. Probabilities were derived from literature reviews. Health state utilities were derived from the authors' ...
متن کاملNatural Childbirth Following Previous Cesarean Section
امروزه شیوع سزارین رو به افزایش است و سیر تصاعدی را طی می کند. یکی از عواملی که بیش از همه در شیوع فزاینده زایمان به طریقه سزارین نقش دارد، سزارین مکرر (۳۰ تا ۲۵ درصد) می باشد. در مورد زنانی که زایمان قبلی شان بوسیله سزارین انجام شده است، این سئوال مطرح است که آیا زایمان آنها باید الزاماً از طریق سزارین انجام شود یا اینکه می توان به آنها اجازه داد تا به لیبر بروند و از طریق واژینال زایمان نمایند.
متن کاملEvaluation of Uterine Scar on Repeat Second Cesarean Section in Patients with Previous Cesarean Section
only marginally increased among women undergoing a trial of labor2 than among those undergrant an elective repeat cesarean section (0.4% vs 0.2% OR=2.1), with a significant decrease in need for transfusion (OR=0.57) or hysterectomy (OR=0.39), has led authorities to encourage vaginal birth after cesarean3. A group of investigators concluded4 that among women with a previously scarred uterus, ind...
متن کاملInduction of labor in women with previous single cesarean section
Results Overall, 1, 898 pregnancies were eligible, of them, 259 underwent induction of labor, and 1, 639 were admitted with spontaneous onset of labor. Demographic data, parity, gestational age at delivery and birthweight were similar. The overall rate of cesarean delivery was significantly higher in the study group (16. 2% vs. 10. 7%, p=0. 01), mainly due to labor dystocia (8. 1% vs. 3. 7%, p<...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology
سال: 2018
ISSN: 2320-1789,2320-1770
DOI: 10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20181922